Natural Gas Drilling Pollution Debate Heats Up Around Marcellus Shale

Until recently, drilling for natural gas trapped in shale formations was not favored by drilling companies due to higher extraction costs. New technologies and a new push for oil independence have natural gas drilling companies clambering for a share in drilling the Appalachian basin's Marcellus Shale formation.

The largest of the U.S. shale gas reserves, Marcellus extends through New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. Though it is estimated to contain up to 500 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, and could theoretically cover U.S. natural gas needs for up to ten years, fear of the toxic chemicals used in the drilling process is fueling widespread public outcry.

At issue is the hydraulic fracturing or "fracking" fluid used in the creation of natural gas wells. The process involves injecting huge volumes of water laced with benzene and hundreds of other toxic chemicals, deep into the earth. Although the chemicals are injected well below the water table, as much as 60% of the fluid is later recovered and sometimes stored above ground in open pits. There is growing evidence that hydraulic fracturing poses a great threat to groundwater quality and public health.

Benzene, an organic solvent linked to several rare and debilitating blood disorders such as aplastic anemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, and acute myelogenous leukemia, is just one of the hundreds of chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluid. The exact compositions of these fluids are largely unknown to the public because Congress has all but completely exempted oil and gas exploration companies from the Federal Emergency Planning and Community Right To Know acts. Environmental experts believe that up to 90% of the chemicals used are toxic to humans.

Oil and Gas Drilling companies are also exempt from the following environmental laws:

  • Safe Drinking Water Act
  • Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (sets standard for hazardous waste handling procedures)

There are countless testimonies from those living near natural gas drilling sites that allege everything form contaminated wells and ground water, to methane seeps causing foul odors, and even exploding wells. If even a fraction of these accounts are partially true, the drilling poses a significant threat to human health, and the environment.  

All this for 10 years worth of natural gas? Pollution on this scale is not easily remedied, future generations will surely scoff at the idea of severely impacting a heavily populated 575 square mile area to obtain a 10 year supply of gas. The "more petroleum at any cost" philosophy may keep our economy going for now, but it will be the key to our eventual undoing.

Until we can shift into an economy based on the sustainable exploitation of our planets resources, we will increasingly poison ourselves and our environment. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Colorado Commissioners Call For Natural Gas Drilling Moratorium

Garfield County Colorado commissioners will ask the state to reinstate a natural gas drilling moratorium in the east Mann creek area near Silt.  

Locals fear a dangerous repeat of a 2004 incident in which hydrocarbons and benzene seeped into a nearby creek.  In the wake of that incident,  EnCana Oil and gas was fined $371,200 and the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, COGCC,  imposed a drilling moratorium.  The moratorium was later lifted but new drilling requirements were added.

In January one of EnCana's wells saw a spike in gas pressure causing benzene contaminated water to flow from the well.  According to EnCana the leak occurred well below the drinking water aquifer, but residents are worried about contamination.  

Benzene is a cancer causing organic solvent used in many industrial applications.

“We ask that the moratorium be reinstated only until such time as a thorough and complete investigation can take place into the failure of stipulations to protect our health and safety as well as the environment,” -Lisa Bracken, area resident.

For those unfamiliar with natural gas drilling and the danger of chemical contamination of aquifers it may pose, allow me to provide a little background information.  Most natural gas wells are created through a process called hydraulic fracturing.  Pioneered by Haliburton, the process shoots large quantities of water, sand, and chemicals, including benzene, several miles underground in order to break up rock and release the natural gas.  This process was deemed safe by a 2004 EPA study which stated that hydraulic fracturing posed no threat to drinking water.  This study caused congress to exempt hydraulic fracturing from the Safe Drinking Water act.  

So the process was at least officially considered safe, until more recent years when several contamination incidents occurred sparking an important debate as to weather chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing threaten drinking water.

Looking back across the industrial century, we cringe at the chemicals and emissions that were released into the air without restriction.  The health damaging air pollution problem was not foreseen by industry, nor would things have improved were they not challenged.   Looking back at those mistakes it seems absurd to this blogger to think we can now pump chemicals into the ground with no negative effects.