Call Toll Free: 1-800-838-0800
From anywhere in the US

Natural Gas Drilling Pollution Debate Heats Up Around Marcellus Shale

Until recently, drilling for natural gas trapped in shale formations was not favored by drilling companies due to higher extraction costs. New technologies and a new push for oil independence have natural gas drilling companies clambering for a share in drilling the Appalachian basin’s Marcellus Shale formation.

The largest of the U.S. shale gas reserves, Marcellus extends through New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. Though it is estimated to contain up to 500 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, and could theoretically cover U.S. natural gas needs for up to ten years, fear of the toxic chemicals used in the drilling process is fueling widespread public outcry.

At issue is the hydraulic fracturing or "fracking" fluid used in the creation of natural gas wells. The process involves injecting huge volumes of water laced with benzene and hundreds of other toxic chemicals, deep into the earth. Although the chemicals are injected well below the water table, as much as 60% of the fluid is later recovered and sometimes stored above ground in open pits. There is growing evidence that hydraulic fracturing poses a great threat to groundwater quality and public health.

Benzene, an organic solvent linked to several rare and debilitating blood disorders such as aplastic anemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, and acute myelogenous leukemia, is just one of the hundreds of chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluid. The exact compositions of these fluids are largely unknown to the public because Congress has all but completely exempted oil and gas exploration companies from the Federal Emergency Planning and Community Right To Know acts. Environmental experts believe that up to 90% of the chemicals used are toxic to humans.

Oil and Gas Drilling companies are also exempt from the following environmental laws:

  • Safe Drinking Water Act
  • Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (sets standard for hazardous waste handling procedures)

There are countless testimonies from those living near natural gas drilling sites that allege everything form contaminated wells and ground water, to methane seeps causing foul odors, and even exploding wells. If even a fraction of these accounts are partially true, the drilling poses a significant threat to human health, and the environment.  

All this for 10 years worth of natural gas? Pollution on this scale is not easily remedied, future generations will surely scoff at the idea of severely impacting a heavily populated 575 square mile area to obtain a 10 year supply of gas. The "more petroleum at any cost" philosophy may keep our economy going for now, but it will be the key to our eventual undoing.

Until we can shift into an economy based on the sustainable exploitation of our planets resources, we will increasingly poison ourselves and our environment. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

This entry was posted by David Austin on Wednesday, May 13th, 2009 at 3:49 am and is filed under Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, Aplastic Anemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Comments

  1. Something to counter the industry spin:
    Currently Alabama is the only state in the US with special provisions to regulate hydraulic fracturing. The other states do not have specific fracturing rules; they rely on general drilling rules – casing, logs, pressure monitoring, waste disposal, etc. – to indirectly cover hydraulic fracturing.
    Colorado has a disclosure rule that is not specific to fracturing – it covers all chemicals used down hole – drilling, fracturing, completion, etc. New York and Pennsylvania also require disclosure of fracking chemicals, but no actual regulation.
    Legislation being considered by Congress would allow most states to remain the primary regulators of hydraulic fracturing, with flexibility as to their programs, but the legislation provides critical federal oversight – something that was lost when Congress passed the “Halliburton loophole” in 2005.

  2. John De Matteo says:

    You mention that the fracturing is well below the water table. Does this mean that water left behind in the ground (estimated to be 40%)will not get into drinking water?
    Ater the pit water “cleaned up” is it put into ground at a level lower than water table?
    Do the states requring disclosure confirm use of benzene in fracturing?
    Is the quantity of benezine sufficient to be a concern?

Leave a Reply